LanguageApps.info

Language App Comparison Tool

Compare different language learning apps side by side to find the best fit for your learning style and goals. Add up to 3 apps to see detailed feature comparisons.

Comparing 3 Apps

NativShark logo

NativShark

View Details
Mango Languages logo

Mango Languages

View Details

Basic Info

Cost
Subscription
Free, Subscription
Free, Subscription
TL;DR
A comprehensive and opinionated platform for learning Japanese that integrates input and reviews. The strict path may not suit all learning styles.
Busuu provides structured language lessons with a unique feature that allows native speakers to correct your speaking and writing exercises. It's a balanced approach for building foundational skills.
Mango offers structured lessons that teach conversational skills through sentence construction and repetition. It's often available for free through public libraries.

Description

Description

NativShark offers a systematic, all-in-one curriculum primarily for Japanese. The methodology is built around comprehensible input, immersion, and a built-in spaced repetition system (SRS) to ensure retention. It guides the user through a long-term, linear path designed to build a deep understanding from the ground up. Its main limitations are its focus on a single language and a rigid structure that offers little flexibility, and it prioritizes input skills heavily over early speaking practice.

Busuu offers well-structured courses that balance vocabulary, grammar, and practical application. Its standout feature is the integrated community, where learners can submit writing and speaking exercises for feedback from native speakers. While the core curriculum provides a solid foundation from beginner to intermediate levels, the quality and speed of community feedback can vary. The app's speech recognition tool is functional but not its main strength, making Busuu a strong choice for those who appreciate guided learning supplemented by human interaction.

Mango Languages offers a structured, conversation-focused curriculum available for a wide range of languages. Its methodology involves breaking down sentences into component parts and encouraging the learner to construct them piece by piece. Lessons emphasize practical communication and are enriched with cultural notes. A notable feature is the voice comparison tool, which allows users to record themselves and visually compare their pronunciation waveform to that of a native speaker. Many users can access Mango Languages for free through participating public libraries, making it a very accessible option.

Features

Key Features
Comprehensive, Structured Course, Comprehensible Input, Immersion, Spaced Repetition, Reading Comprehension
Structured Course, Communicative Approach, Community, Writing Practice, Speaking Practice, Comprehensive, Bite Sized Lessons, Grammar Practice, Offline Access
Structured Course, Communicative Approach, Speaking Practice, Pronunciation Training, Audio Lingual, Travel Focused

Limitations

Known Issues
Small Language Selection, Limited Speaking Practice, Rigid Curriculum
Bad Speech Recognition, Inconsistent Community Feedback
Repetitive Content, Shallow Content, Limited Writing Practice

Core Methodology & Pedagogy

Comprehensible Input
Immersion
Communicative Approach
Audio Lingual

Content & Material Type

Structured Course
Spaced Repetition

Primary Skill Focus

Grammar Practice
Speaking Practice
Pronunciation Training
Reading Comprehension
Writing Practice

Interaction & Technology

Community
Offline Access

Learning Context & Style

Bite Sized Lessons
Travel Focused
Comprehensive
NativShark vs. Busuu vs. Mango Languages Comparison | LanguageApps.info | LanguageApps.info