LanguageApps.info

Language App Comparison Tool

Compare different language learning apps side by side to find the best fit for your learning style and goals. Add up to 3 apps to see detailed feature comparisons.

Comparing 3 Apps

LingoDeer logo

LingoDeer

View Details
Mango Languages logo

Mango Languages

View Details

Basic Info

Cost
Free, Subscription
Free, Subscription
Free, Subscription
TL;DR
LingoDeer offers in-depth, grammar-focused courses, particularly strong for East Asian languages like Japanese, Korean, and Chinese.
LingQ helps you learn by reading and listening to interesting content. It tracks your known words and lets you look up and save new vocabulary from context.
Mango offers structured lessons that teach conversational skills through sentence construction and repetition. It's often available for free through public libraries.

Description

Description

LingoDeer is often seen as a more structured alternative to apps like Duolingo. It provides a well-organized curriculum with detailed grammar explanations at the beginning of each lesson, which is especially helpful for understanding complex languages. The app is highly regarded for its courses in Japanese, Korean, and Chinese. While its lesson format can feel repetitive, it builds a solid foundation in grammar and vocabulary for beginner to intermediate learners.

LingQ is a language learning platform built on the principle of comprehensible input. It provides a vast library of articles, podcasts, interviews, and books, often with accompanying audio. As users read and listen, they can instantly look up new words and save them as "LingQs" for later review with a built-in spaced repetition system. The app visually tracks vocabulary growth, allowing learners to choose content suited to their level. It's an excellent tool for intermediate to advanced learners looking to expand their vocabulary and improve comprehension through massive exposure to authentic material.

Mango Languages offers a structured, conversation-focused curriculum available for a wide range of languages. Its methodology involves breaking down sentences into component parts and encouraging the learner to construct them piece by piece. Lessons emphasize practical communication and are enriched with cultural notes. A notable feature is the voice comparison tool, which allows users to record themselves and visually compare their pronunciation waveform to that of a native speaker. Many users can access Mango Languages for free through participating public libraries, making it a very accessible option.

Features

Key Features
Structured Course, Grammar First, Comprehensive, Bite Sized Lessons, Grammar Practice
Comprehensible Input, Immersion, Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Article Based, Audio Based, Vocabulary Builder
Structured Course, Communicative Approach, Speaking Practice, Pronunciation Training, Audio Lingual, Travel Focused

Limitations

Known Issues
Limited Speaking Practice, Repetitive Content
Limited Speaking Practice, Weak Grammar Explanation, Passive Learning Focus
Repetitive Content, Shallow Content, Limited Writing Practice

Core Methodology & Pedagogy

Grammar First
Comprehensible Input
Immersion
Communicative Approach
Audio Lingual

Content & Material Type

Structured Course
Audio Based
Article Based

Primary Skill Focus

Vocabulary Builder
Grammar Practice
Speaking Practice
Pronunciation Training
Listening Comprehension
Reading Comprehension

Learning Context & Style

Bite Sized Lessons
Travel Focused
Comprehensive
LingoDeer vs. LingQ vs. Mango Languages Comparison | LanguageApps.info | LanguageApps.info